Alternative Investment Management Software

Risk Shell

Institutional portfolio management, risk analytics and portfolio construction for alternative and multi-asset portfolios.

Integrated investment data, stress testing, portfolio optimization, alternative investment analytics and shadow accounting within one platform.

FoF Manager hero
FoF Manager

Shadow Accounting for Alternative Portfolios

Manage hedge funds, private equity and multi-asset portfolios with liquidity controls, custom classifications and flexible historical accounting.

35+ hedge fund liquidity settings
Explore FoF Manager
Optimization hero
Portfolio Optimization

Nonlinear Portfolio Optimization

Construct hedge fund-of-funds and multi-asset portfolios with stress-test, factor-exposure, liquidity and other user-defined constraints.

Custom Constraints for market-neutral and risk-controlled portfolio construction
Explore Portfolio Optimization
Risk Shell AI hero
Risk Shell AI

Natural-Language Access to Risk Shell

Use natural language to access investment research, risk analytics and portfolio workflows.

2.3B tokens in our in-house financial LLM
Explore Risk Shell AI
Macroeconomic Scenario Screening hero
Macroeconomic Scenario Screening

Select Assets for the Scenario You Define

Screen managers by risk and return targets under user-defined macroeconomic scenarios.

Trend Segmentation™ proprietary regime-analysis engine
Explore Scenario Screening
Peer-relative Stress Testing
Portfolio Stress Testing

Peer-Relative Stress Testing

Compare extreme-event outcomes with a relevant peer group.

500K+ live stress-tested instruments
Explore stress testing

Over the last decade, we have been witnessing a degrading quality of large institutional investors including their own investment research and outsourced due diligence. That trend has become obvious after collapsing the giants like Lehman Brothers or Bear Stearns; however, its causes have never been investigated in details.

Though we may find tons of articles attributing the finance meltdown to an abstract subprime mortgage crisis or a market cyclicity, the press seems to be reluctant to dip further to the bottom and analyze the real reasons. We believe that the devastating trend was triggered by one major reason - an incredible institutional incompetence across all levels, from the top management down to risk analysts and portfolio managers.        

While it is not our aim to analyze the reasons created the favorable environment supporting and protecting such incompetence, we can only state the facts based on our own experience of dealing with hundreds of institutions of all calibers, including top investment banks, superannuation funds and medium investment houses. Based on the given facts, we have to adopt the sensible approach to the due diligence frameworks and a common perception of institutions as safe havens:

A dedicated investor should not rely on big names as a warranty of quality and professional investment, neither consider institutional employees as experts in their fields by default. It is not a case anymore. The only way of justifying any asset allocation is through sophisticated due diligence incorporating both the qualitative and quantitative elements.

 

Large institutions tend to employ a less competent staff than their small peers. It is, probably, explained by the practice of staff placement solely based on the "career promotion skills and intrigues" rather than professionalism. Smaller institutions simply cannot afford this.

 

We believe that the only way of moving forward is through a complete house cleaning and inevitable collapse of big-to-medium players, because the rotten structures rooted on corporate hypocrisy and incompetence cannot be healed. As such, investors have to be even more careful when considering allocations to the used-to-be bulletproofed parties.